Monday 31 October 2011

Halloween Love For Prince's Purple Rain -- From a Toddler

Halloween Love For Prince's Purple Rain -- From a Toddler

Halloween Love For Prince's Purple Rain -- From a Toddler

What's our favorite thing about Halloween? It's not the loads of candy. Not the classic horror movie screenings, either. It's not the trick-or-treating or letting our costumed selves loose into the night. Our ounce of warm fuzzies for today comes from the cute kids decked out, fluffed up and painted into the stuff of fantasy and folklore, pop culture and what's for dinner.

Our favorite so far is 2-year-old El'Leon (pictured above), who's already a diehard Prince fan. This Halloween is he's dressing up as his favorite singer. And to top it off: the little guy can reportedly already sing the hook! Thanks to Nena Soulfly for the adorable photo.

We're ending the day as often as possible by celebrating love. We welcome your ideas for posts. Send suggestions to submissions@colorlines.com, and be sure to put "Celebrate Love" in the subject line. You can send links to videos, g! raphics, photos, quotes, whatever. Or just chime in to the comments below and we'll find you. Be sure to let us know you've got the rights to share any media you send.

To see other Love posts visit our Celebrate Love page.

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer Visits Alabama, Praises Immigration Law HB 56

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer Visits Alabama, Praises Immigration Law HB 56

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer Visits Alabama, Praises Immigration Law HB 56

Alabama's draconian immigration enforcement law H.B. 56 has had a tough time in the courts. But there is one person lobbying and making her support for the law very public: Jan Brewer, the Arizona governor who's S.B.1070 law was the harshest anti-immigrant legislation in the country before Alabama took its place.

Brewer held a press conference in Huntsville, Alabama on Friday to promote her new book (that has a forward written, unsurprisingly by Sarah Palin) and offered her support for the H.B. 56.

Brewer said she was encouraged by Alabama's lawmakers for passing the law and Gov. Robert Bentley signing it, the Huntsville Times reports. She said those steps "took courage." Brewer also said she was encouraged by the federal court decisions leaving parts of Alabama's law in place.

Brewer said the "liberal media" has helped encourage the characterization of the Arizona law as being wrong, racist and bigoted.

"That's totally untrue," Brewer countered. "The bottom line is we have to explain to people we are a nation of laws."

Alabama's H.B. 56 went a lot further than Arizona's H.B. 1070 law. Many of the provisions that were blocked in the Arizona law were allowed to go through in Alabama. For a more thorough explanation of the most recent rulings, read Julianne Hing's take in "Profiling's Legal! Court Upholds Alabama's Immigration Law."



Keenen Wayans: 'In Living Color' is Making a Comeback

Keenen Wayans: 'In Living Color' is Making a Comeback

Keenen Wayans: 'In Living Color' is Making a Comeback

Keenen Ivory Wayans will bring his classic sketch comedy "In Living Color" series back to Fox next spring. If the show does well it, could come back for good, according to the Hollywood Reporter.

Wayans is slated to produce two half-hour specials that will take a contemporary spin on the classic show that aired from 1990-1994. The show will feature "fresh, young talent" as well as musical performances by special guests.

Wayans left the show that he started with his brother Damon after the third season due to disagreements with Fox over censorship.

In August, Fox premiered a half-hour sketch-comedy produce by Jamie Foxx called "In The Flow With Affion Crockett," in press releases to the media Fox said the show was "in the vein" of "In living color." The show was cancelled shortly after its premiere.

Big Bank Law Firm Mocks Foreclosed Homeowners on Halloween

Big Bank Law Firm Mocks Foreclosed Homeowners on Halloween

Big Bank Law Firm Mocks Foreclosed Homeowners on Halloween

There's an important op-ed this week in the New York Times that marks the first anniversary of one of the most tasteless Halloween stunts in recent memory. Last year, employees from the New York law firm of Steven J. Baum -- which represents the country's top lenders, including Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo -- openly mocked families facing foreclosures for which their clients were directly responsible.

The tastelesness in question was the "foreclosed homeowner" party that the firm's employees held last year. Apparently, it's an annual affair. Joe Nocera of the Times recently published six pictures sent to him by a tipster, who says the party is an annual event. The photos show the alleged employees dressed as homeless people on the street, holding signs bemoaning their lost homes. They're awful, and you can all of them here.

The tipster says they worked for firm. Nocera has more:

When we spoke later, she added that the snapshots are an accurate representation of the firm's mind-set. "There is this really cavalier attitude," she said. "It doesn't matter that people are going to lose their homes." Nor does the firm try to help people get mortgage modifications; the pressure, always, is to foreclose. I told her I wanted to post the photos on The Times's Web site so that readers could see them. She agreed, but asked to remain anonymous because she said she fears retaliation.

Let me describe a few of the photos. In one, two Baum employees are dressed like homeless people. One is holding a bottle of liquor. The other has a sign around her neck that reads: "3rd party squatter. I lost my home and I was never served." My source said that "I was never served" is meant to mock "the typical excuse" of the homeowner trying to evade a foreclosure proceeding.

A second picture shows a coffin with a picture of a woman whose eyes have been cut out. A sign on the coffin reads: "Rest in Peace. Crazy Susie." The reference is to Susan Chana Lask, a lawyer who had filed a class-action suit against Steven J. Baum -- and had posted a YouTube video denouncing the firm's foreclosure practices. "She was a thorn in their side," said my source.

No word on if the firm's Halloween party took place this year. They're currently under investigation by the state attorney for shady business practices. They also got word that the New York Times was publishing a piece about them last week.

Can Your Halloween Costume Be Racist, Even If You Aren't? [Reader Forum]

Can Your Halloween Costume Be Racist, Even If You Aren't? [Reader Forum]

Can Your Halloween Costume Be Racist, Even If You Aren't? [Reader Forum]

This past week, our pop culture blogger Jorge Rivas broke all previous records for number of comments on a Colorlines.com post. His profile of Ohio student group STARS' poster campaign against casual Halloween racism has pulled in 300 comments at the time of this writing, and they're still coming in.

Jorge credits his use of a Mean Girls reference in the first graf. But also, STARS has come up with an incisive, impeccably done campaign that's raising some tough new questions for a lot of people. Commenters on the post, many of them first-timers to Colorlines, arrived with some fundamental issues to address. Where is the line between funny and offensive, and who says where it is? Is this censorship? Where are the negative stereotypes about white people, and does white privilege exist when your whole family is broke? Is this campaign calling white people racist, and isn't that a racial stereotype as well -- and isn't being a racist the worst thing to be? In the real world, how does a Halloween costume fuel systemic bigotry?

These are issues that'll be with us for many Halloweens to come, and we're pleased to be hosting a (largely civil!) discussion of them. With no further ado, here's a very small sample of what you had to say.

Joanna:

I posted the graphic on my Facebook wall and was shocked by my friend's responses. They were saying it was ridiculous and overly PC, basically implying it's their right to appropriate these stereotypes for entertainment purposes. It's a great campaign, but also eye-opening in a very disturbing way.


Craig Berger:

Perhaps the thing that many people seem to struggle with is the meaning and the feeling that comes from addressing the term "racist." As a white person, raised that racism was absolutely disgusting, I grew up learning to recoil at everything that was labeled racist. The idea of racism was disgusting to the point that I never wanted to admit that I could be racist, and I started to view it as some rare, extraordinary thing.

But after getting to know more people from diverse backgrounds and hearing their stories and going to college and grad school, I realize now that whether I like it or not, society is inherently racist. I benefit from many of my identities (being a white, heterosexual, man raised in a middle class, Christian household) because society treats me as normal, or the standard, while some of my friends who identify as African American, Latino, or Asian are viewed as "others."

So while racism is indeed a negative thing, it's not as rare as we might think. We might not feel it or see it as much as white people because it's hidden by our inherited privileges, but I am convinced that others who are not protected by society absolutely feel it.

[...] Given the exploitation of specific groups in society at the hands of white people, there is a unique, symbolic meaning found in the act of creating a caricature of those groups that isn't found in mocking the groups ... mentioned (vikings, cowboys, etc.), and to the groups who continue to be exploited and targeted in society, it's painful.

What makes this difficult for many white people to understand is their privilege, or the set of certain, unearned benefits bestowed upon them by society. In America, we are conditioned to view whiteness as normalcy, and so there are things as white people we experience that we don't think twice about (the color of a Band-Aid, for example) that can be painful to other groups in society.

I suppose the main thing from this is that no one is telling you whether or not you are "allowed" to do anything or not. If you're reading this, I am guessing you're fairly capable of making your own decisions. But I think what this campaign is asking all of us to do is stop and think about how our actions--which we often take for granted and fail to analyze anyway--might impact those around us who have differing experiences in life. And if you're not sure how others' experiences differ from yours, maybe that's an opportunity to start listening and thinking.


Tyrone Bhart:

Thanks Craig for the critical analysis and lack of right or wrong judgement. It definitely helps me clarify the situation and empathizes with those who felt this campaign was necessary, as well as what they hoped to achieve. 

However, in fairness, I think it would have had a greater impact had it included stereotypes from white cultures that are also harshly judged- perhaps a Catholic priest with a young boy, or an orthodox Jew, or even a US military soldier- you can't say they have a great image to the majority of Americans. Heck, a KKK costume is equivalent to an Arab terrorist in my mind. I find that very offensive. 

But in the end, part of what makes America so great is that we CAN dress up as these things and a discussion like this can occur because we have the freedom and cultural awareness to allow it- even though it may be uncomfortable from time to time.


[...] What makes a "people" or a culture anyway? Is it not a culture until it's repressed or vilified or slandered? I think there is an entire culture of suburban white kids who listen to pop music and spend their weekend sexting each other. I think it's a deplorable culture, but it is what they know and who they are. Is it okay to make fun of them or not? Why?

[...]Honestly, if someone is stupid enough to honestly believe one of those cultural stereotypes then they aren't worth anyone's time. If we weren't all so kind, natural selection would take care of such imbeciles.

vtteacher:

[...] I wish the people who didn't believe these stereotypes could easily be ignored. Unfortunately, many are in positions of power & influence: just look at AL's new "immigration" law. While some may be motivated simply by wanting a more law-based society, this is also a huge push-back against another culture based on negative stereotypes.


schatt:

Where's the white guy tearfully holding up a picture of a businessman?

parkwood1920:

When white businessmen are detained at Guantanamo Bay or federal detention centers for the crime of solely being white businessmen, or beaten to death by teenagers who joke about "stomping a businessman," you let me know.


Osa Taas:

At what point is the line drawn though?  What if I admire Harriet Tubman and want to dress as her for Halloween?  Am I 'not allowed' because I'm not African American?  I agree that intentionally derogatory costumes should be avoided, but it could also be a slippery slope.


[...] Maybe we can just make it, "If we really want to fight racism, then one of the most important things that people need to do is really listen to other people."

Rowan Griffith:

Well yeah, but white people tend to get listened to way more than everybody else, and at the expense of people of color.


FlutterDoo:

People don't listen to me at all.  Maybe you're confusing "White People" with "Rich People", because there are more rich white people than non-white people.  But that can't be, because then YOU would be the racist, assuming all white people are rich and get their voices heard, huh?


I think these people are being stupid and need to grow thicker skin. Hell, I'm also gay!  If some straight guy goes around acting gay and wiggling dildos in everyone's face it's because he's choosing to act stupid for Halloween, WHO CARES!?

PersephoneF:

so....only white people of any nationality can be racist? If a black woman wanted to dress as a geisha, that's okay?


shannon mason:

1 in 3 Native women will be raped once in their lifetime. 

Whenever I see someone wandering around on Halloween in a groin high skirt with fake feathers and a little vest barely covering their chest, I think of this statistic. I am also reminded of the fact that more than 80% of these crimes are perpetrated by non-native men. 

1 in 10 black men in the United States aged 25 to 29 is incarcerated.

When I see someone jokingly sipping from a ridiculous plastic chalice dressed as a pimp, I remember the fact that the more young black men are incarcerated than any other racial group. That nearly 50% of the prison population is black.

Dressing up just makes these realities seem okay. And they're not. By going out as a reinforcement of a stereotype we are only reinforcing that these are the available roles for us to fulfill... sexualized object, hustler, lazy worker... there's nothing fun about it.


Evan Johnson:

These statistics are daunting, but we are talking about halloween costumes. If everyone suddenly decided to go as something boring like an apple or bumblebee, those stats probably wouldn't change.


snookifan:

[...] Personally, I think being called racist is probably the one attack minorities have against white people and STARS took full advantage of that.  I'm not surprised by how people are reacting to it.  It's not fair and also it's not helping the situation at all... and really, it's RACIST.


CJ_Canadian:

Racism = prejudice + power.


Aliza Flores:

Regardless of our opinion on this matter, it is important that we think about the corporate side of all of this. People spend so much money on buying costumes every year. We are not the ones benefiting from this in any way. Just think about this, they're making money out of mocking and diminishing people, and that their choice of mocking POC and other groups is conscious. This is not coincidental.



libractivist:

A) It's blatantly unfair to revel in the "exoticism" of someone else's culture, whether you mean it in a positive or a negative way, when that very "exoticism" or otherness keeps people in that culture from ever fully fitting in, plays into whether or not they can get a job, makes them more likely to be arrested, or simply colors every interaction they have with the assumption that they will be "smart" or "hard working" or "sassy" or "submissive".

B) Even if you're trying very, very hard to emulate someone you respect -- it's 99% sure that as a white person (or as a man, or as a straight person, or...) you cannot actually do justice to what it means to be a person of color who lives with the experience of racism (or a woman who is subject to sexism, or a queer person...you get the point.) There are other ways to honor someone than to act like you identify with them when you really can't.

C) Blackface: Just don't do it. Blackface, particularly in America, has a long and awful history of being used specifically to mock African Americans. Even if you're emulating a particular person, even if you mean it in the best possible way, even if it wasn't your ancestors who did that...just accept that blackface will always have those connotations and be hurtful to some people.

As a white person, you have about 80 billion other costume choices -- most of our pop stars and media people and kids characters and movie idols are white. So really...let's not pretend showing a little respect is going to destroy our fun.


[...] The reason stereotypes of people of colour are hurtful in a way that stereotypes of white people aren't is that they are often the only images we see. While the media is full of people of Austrian and other European descent being good, bad, and everything in between, minorities are all too often essentialized to one (often negative) archetype. 

It has nothing to do with believing white people are "the only ones who do bad stuff on earth", and everything to do with learning to understand CONTEXT.



Once a week, we highlight some of the best comments from our readers. Want to join the conversation? Talk with us here in the comments on Colorlines.com, or on Facebook and Twitter.

Three Feminists Talk About The Media's Obessession With Unwed Black Women

Three Feminists Talk About The Media's Obessession With Unwed Black Women

Three Feminists Talk About The Media's Obessession With Unwed Black Women

To hear comedian Steve Harvey tell it, black women have a problem. Too many are single, Harvey says, and it's reaching epic proportions.  So he's set out to fix this imaginary problem with a string of self-help seminars and romance advice books.

Sadly, Harvey isn't alone in his fanaticism. He's just one of many people, including mainstream news outlets, academic researchers, and even some black women who've jumped on the patriarchal bandwagon, wagged their finger, and asked "Why aren't black woman getting married?"

But rarely does anyone ask black women what they think. So we did. We reached out to three brilliant, self-identified black feminists to get their take on the media's obsession with who black women choose to love, and how. What follows is a candid, hilarious and insightful part of the conversation on black love that we don't often to get to hear.

joan_morgan.jpg

Joan Morgan is an award-winning writer, journalist and author of "When Chickenheads Come Home to Roost: My Life as a Hip-Hop Feminist."


On the media's obsession with unwed black women:


I think we're at a point where there's literally been a commercial commodification of black women's expre! ssions of pain or loneliness. Those are very real, if not always racially specific, difficulties that we're having navigating relationships.

This whole industry is approached from the idea that there's something wrong with black women and that we need to be fixed. And even more offensively, "I can provide you the solution for that." Is Steve Harvey really the guy you wanna end up with? Like, truly, is that your ideal?

This is not My Fair Lady.  I'm just trying to really not slip into the full range of expression for what a bunch of bloody fuckery I think it is.

On the need to revisit the institution of marriage:

We don't really seem to analyze the fact that marriage is a complicated institution as it exists in the 21st Century precisely because it was never designed historically to be about romantic love. It was very financially based, and church-based. It fed the church's need to consistently support and reproduce ! itself. Maybe the question is not "Why can't I get married?" b! ut "Does marriage, in the way that it exists, with no revision possible, fulfill who we are in the 21st Century?" Or is there another way to form productive long-lasting meaningful relationships?

And how can we do that without demonizing women who are single, or mothers who are single, so we don't see "No Marriage,  No Womb"?

None of these brothers are thinking like that. At all. They just reinforce all of these really ridiculous and very patriarchal notions that basically say the job in the relationship is for the woman to fix herself and become what the man wants. And keep adjusting and fixing herself so she continues to be what's desired -- without ever really asking the reasons of his own shortcomings, basically, or their own contributions in the ways that our relationships struggle.


On what we should talk about instead:

I'm not really big on relationship advice, I don't think that's my strong point. But I do think ! there is an issue with, you know, if you're intimate with somebody, you deserve a conversation. You don't deserve to go back and forth in these long exchanges via text messages or via Facebook. There is something to be said about being able to look into someone's eyes, and say what you have to say. And be able to receive what they have to say.

I think that we shouldn't shortchange ourselves on our expectation of communication. We shouldn't shortchange the communication within ourselves and our partners in these ways that undercut human connection. And then I think you just have to listen. In a multitasking world it becomes very difficult to really be fully engaged and present. Listen. And I mean listen and not be formulating your counterargument while the other person is speaking. I mean, really be present.


Jamilah Lamieux is a writer and founder of the The Beautiful Strug! gler.Jamilah.jpg

On the persistence of black pathology narratives:

I think that, well basically anything that's gonna get website clicks and sell magazines and get viewers, the media's gonna take advantage of that. I don't think it's necessarily deliberately malicious so much as it's simply opportunist. If black women were not buying the Steve Harvey book, if we weren't tuning into these specials, if there was no audience for this--and its not just a black female audience, obviously--but if there was no audience there would be no conversation.

But at the same time, black pathology narratives tend to sell. And just the concept of some inherent black deficiency has always been profitable.

So I think that the "tragic, unwed, unlovable black woman" is just a fad right now. It's just an extension of the many stereotypes that there ! have been historically about black women: the Jezebel, the mammy.

I think it's in part in reaction to the current First Family. We have three generations of happy black women living in one house. You have a First Lady who's beautiful and glamorous and is who is not only a force in her own right but supported and admired by the leader of the free world. And I think that image makes some people very uncomfortable.

On black women leading the conversation:


These are conversations that need to be held in our homes, in our friend circles, in our churches, and also in our media. So that's your Colorlines, your Essence, your Ebony, your Clutch, your blogs. We have public communal spaces in which to have these conversations and I think a big challenge is finding ways to have  these them without allowing anyone with a v! oice to be anointed as an expert. We've allowed a comedian wit! h a hist ory of infidelity and "failed marriages" to be our relationship guru. We should instead be focused on having a conversation, as opposed to looking for a savior or a diagnosis.



susana.jpg

Susana Morris is co-editor of The Crunk Feminist Collective.

On how intimacy and sexuality change over a lifetime:

I think that not only do we get over this notion that black women are deviant or pathological, but also I'd be interested in seeing just the ways in which black women themselves are engaging intimacy at different stages in our lives. You know, it looks different in your teens versus your 20s, versus your 30s. We need more really frank, pro-sex conversations that a! re not simply focused on marriage, but, what are my support systems like? How am I rebuking this notion of the "strong black woman"?

I hate that these discourses are so heteronormative. There are lots of queer sisters out there who are engaging in intimacy. What can all of us learn from one another?

On Living Single -- Or Not:

One of the Crunk Feminists posts that was most popular earlier this year was a post that talked about how we need to re-think how society is trying to make couples the standard, and what that might mean for someone who is not in a committed, monogamous sexual relationship. And how real people on the street are enacting support. I mean, that was a really popular post and when I saw it go up I thought, "Okay, we're gonna get some backlash because people are gonna be like, 'No what we really want is traditional marriage.'" But so ! many of the comments were, "You really spoke to my condition,"! "This i s what I'm experiencing," "Me and my homegirls were talking about how we're all gonna live together and support one another," or "I'm engaging in polyamory and rejecting monogamous relationships," or "I'm holding off on dating because I'm trying to finish my PhD." There were so many ways in which people were responding and saying, "Actually, the discourse that's out there, folks just moaning and bemoaning being unmarried, is not the only discourse. We're really talking about lots of different things in our communities."



Ohio Univ. Activist Explains 'We're a Culture, Not a Costume' Campaign

Ohio Univ. Activist Explains 'We're a Culture, Not a Costume' Campaign

By now you've probably heard about S.T.A.R.S., the small group of Ohio University students that took it upon themselves to start an educational campaign about Halloween costumes that are based on race, ethic traditions or stereotypes. S.T.A.R.S., which stands for Students Teaching About Racism in Society, launched a campaign that not only made national headlines, but raised lots and lots of questions.

The Colorlines.com story that featured S.T.A.R.S.' "We're a culture, not a costume" campaign quickly became one of our most popular posts. Some disagreed with the campaign, while others loved it and still others weren't quite sure what to make of it.

On Friday, Ohio University student and S.T.A.R.S. treasurer Stephanie Sheeley spoke with me via Skype to provide an update on the campaign and how they've dealt with all the attention since it's gone viral. She also addressed some of the questions that arose from the almost 300 comments on our story.

Watch the video above that's above. But be gentle; it's our first try at this new Skype-interview format. We're excited about it, and hope it gets better with time. 

Friday 28 October 2011

Chicana Writer Cherríe Moraga Needs Your Help

Chicana Writer Cherríe Moraga Needs Your Help

It's been 30 years since queer Chicana poet Cherríe Moraga co-authored "This Bridge Called My Back" with Gloria Anzaldúa. The book is still praised as an influential anthology of radical writings by women of color, and has become standard in many gender and ethnic studies classrooms across the country. Moraga has remained a prolific writer over the past three decades, and now she's reaching out to her community for help with her latest work.

Her new play is called "New Fire: To Put Things Right Again" and, if it gets the financial support that it needs, will premiere in time for Brava Theater's 25th anniversary next year in San Francisco. The play is currently in pre-production. Moraga and her partner, producer Celia Herrera Rodríguez, have begun a Kickstarter campaign to raise funds and start rehearsals next month. In short, it's the story of a 52-year-old woman who battles against apocalyptic notions of 2012 to return to her indigenous heritage.

The project has already got an impressive cast that includes comedian Adelina Anthony. With less than five days left to in the fundraiser, the campaign is still $6,000 short of its $26,500 goal. Go here to make a donation and help the play become a reality.

We're ending the day as often as possible by celebrating love. We welcome your ideas for posts. Send suggestions to submissions@colorlines.com, and be sure to put "Celebrate Love" in the subject line. You can send links to videos, graphics, photos, quotes, whatever. Or just chime in to the comments below and we'll find you. Be sure to let us know you've got the rights to share any media you send.

To see other Love posts visit our Celebrate Love page.



Selena Quintanilla Wins Billboard Award 16 Years After Her Death

Selena Quintanilla Wins Billboard Award 16 Years After Her Death

The late Mexican-American singer Selena won the "Digital Download Artist of the Year" award at the Billboard Mexican Music Awards that aired on Telemundo on Thursday night. The singer-songwriter's life ended right as she became one of the first Spanish-language singers to successfully crossover to the English-market.

"It means a lot that even all these years after her death, she is still so loved," Selena's father, Abraham Quintanilla, told AARP.

It's been sixteen years since the singer was murdered, but this isn't the first award she's won since her death. Billboard Magazine called Selena the best Latin Artist of the decade in December 1999.

The Billboard Mexican Music Awards are determined by chart performance as chronicled in Billboard Magazine and on Billboard.com in a 12-month span--August 28, 2010-August 20, 2011.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Postal Service issued a commemorative stamp featuring Selena.  An album of 10 of her previously unreleased songs will be issued next year.